| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:48 am    Post subject: Sashimi Sword,  or Jelly? |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Code: |  	  | . . .|8 4 9|2 . 7 . . .|7 . .|. 3 8
 . . .|. 2 .|. 9 .
 -----+-----+-----
 . 5 .|9 . .|3 4 .
 . . .|. . .|. . .
 . 7 3|. . 4|. 2 .
 -----+-----+-----
 . 4 .|. 9 .|. . .
 3 8 .|. . 7|. . .
 1 . 7|2 3 6|. . .
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| tlanglet 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2468
 Location: Northern California Foothills
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:19 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I did spot a Sashimi Swordfish that did not provide any direct eliminations, but I did not spot the Jelly. 	  | Quote: |  	  | treating it like a Kraken Swordfish, I deleted 6 from r3c4. Then a Type 1 UR 49, coloring 1 and a xy-wing 136 completed the task. 
 | 
 
 Ted
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:36 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| After basics, there is a finned (non-Sashimi) Swordfish that produces an elimination. I didn't find a Jellyfish, either. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:57 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I never thought that it was the easy way.   
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | .------------.-------------------.--------------. | 5   3  *16 | 8     4     9     | 2   *16  7   |
 | 4   2   9  | 7    *156  *15    | 56   3   8   |
 | 7   16  8  | 356   2     35    | 146  9   145 |
 :------------+-------------------+--------------:
 | 8   5  *12 | 9     7    *12    | 3    4   6   |
 | 26  16  4  | 13    58-1  235-1 | 7    58  9   |
 | 9   7   3  | 56    568   4     | 18   2   15  |
 :------------+----------------- -+--------------:
 | 26  4   25 | 15    9     8     | 16   7   3   |
 | 3   8   56 | 4    *15    7     | 9   *16  2   |
 | 1   9   7  | 2     3     6     | 458  58  45  |
 '------------'-------------------'--------------'
 | 
 
 Edited to correct r2c5,  thanks Danny.
 
 Last edited by wapati on Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:03 am; edited 1 time in total
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:00 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| This works also. 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | .------------------.------------------.------------------. | 5     3    *16   | 8     4     9    | 2    *16    7    |
 | 4     2     9    | 7     156   15   | 156   3     8    |
 | 7     16    8    | 356   2     135  | 1456  9     145  |
 :------------------+------------------+------------------:
 | 8     5    *12   | 9     7    *12   | 3     4     6    |
 | 26    16    4    | 1356  58-1  1235 | 7     58    9    |
 | 9     7     3    | 156   1568  4    | 158   2     15   |
 :------------------+------------------+------------------:
 | 26    4     25   | 15    9     8    | 16    7     3    |
 | 3     8     56   | 4    *15    7    | 9    *16    2    |
 | 1     9     7    | 2     3     6    | 458   58    45   |
 '------------------'------------------'------------------'
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:20 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I look for big fish. 
 I am aware that they are often the long path.
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:39 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | wapati wrote: |  	  | I never thought that it was the easy way.   
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | .------------.-------------------.--------------. | 5   3  *16 | 8     4     9     | 2   *16  7   |
 | 4   2   9  | 7    *151  *15    | 56   3   8   |
 | 7   16  8  | 356   2     35    | 146  9   145 |
 :------------+-------------------+--------------:
 | 8   5  *12 | 9     7    *12    | 3    4   6   |
 | 26  16  4  | 13    58-1  235-1 | 7    58  9   |
 | 9   7   3  | 56    568   4     | 18   2   15  |
 :------------+----------------- -+--------------:
 | 26  4   25 | 15    9     8     | 16   7   3   |
 | 3   8   56 | 4    *15    7     | 9   *16  2   |
 | 1   9   7  | 2     3     6     | 458  58  45  |
 '------------'-------------------'--------------'
 | 
 | 
 With your PM, there definitely isn't an easy way! You may wish to review the contents of cell [r2c5] -- <156>!
 
 This puzzle has many solution paths. When you find a Jellyfish this deep into the solution, there's no guarantee that others will encounter it as well. I had a finned Franken Swordfish that took out [r5c5]<>1 prior to your Jellyfish ... and ... it took out the Jellyfish in the process.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:09 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  | 
 This puzzle has many solution paths. When you find a Jellyfish this deep into the solution, there's no guarantee that others will encounter it as well. I had a finned Franken Swordfish that took out [r5c5]<>1 prior to your Jellyfish ... and ... it took out the Jellyfish in the process.
 | 
 
 Yep.  I doubt that anyone, but you, finds a franken anything before a jelly or sashimi-sword.  I have been wrong before, will be again, I doubt it on this one?
   
 What does surprise me is that nobody else sees the jelly or the sashimi-sword.  I guess my preference for big fish handicaps me in seeing other patterns. <sigh>
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:50 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Quote: |  	  | What does surprise me is that nobody else sees the jelly or the sashimi-sword. | 
 I don't know what a sashimi is, but I've basically given up--a long time ago--on swordfish and jellyfish. Perhaps I don't know when to look for them and don't how to look for them efficiently, but they're too much effort for too little return.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:05 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  |  	  | Quote: |  	  | What does surprise me is that nobody else sees the jelly or the sashimi-sword. | 
 I don't know what a sashimi is, but I've basically given up--a long time ago--on swordfish and jellyfish. Perhaps I don't know when to look for them and don't how to look for them efficiently, but they're too much effort for too little return.
 | 
 
 I mostly agree with you.
 
 I look for them because I like them.
 
 I do not suggest them as a solving method,  unless you enjoy finding them.
 
 Remote pairs are about as rare.
 
 M-wings,  probably.
 
 Look for what interests you,  as I am sure we all do.
 
 Edited to add:
 Skyscraper is the basic sashimi.
 It is an x-wing where only one pair of the strong links line up.
 All sashimi are fish where one level does not line up.  Simple, to me.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:11 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | wapati wrote: |  	  | Yep.  I doubt that anyone, but you, finds a franken anything before a jelly or sashimi-sword.  I have been wrong before, will be again, I doubt it on this one?   
 | 
 An Empty Rectangle is a finned Franken X-Wing, and lots of members seem to have no trouble finding them. It's just a slight stretch to extend it to a finned Franken Swordfish.
   
 
  	  | wapati wrote: |  	  | What does surprise me is that nobody else sees the jelly or the sashimi-sword.  I guess my preference for big fish handicaps me in seeing other patterns. <sigh> | 
 I spent 30 minutes using my solver to try and find which steps you used to get to the PM with the Jellyfish. I finally decided that I didn't want to know badly enough
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:25 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  |  	  | wapati wrote: |  	  | Yep.  I doubt that anyone, but you, finds a franken anything before a jelly or sashimi-sword.  I have been wrong before, will be again, I doubt it on this one?   
 | 
 An Empty Rectangle is a finned Franken X-Wing, and lots of members seem to have no trouble finding them. It's just a slight stretch to extend it to a finned Franken Swordfish.
   
 
  	  | wapati wrote: |  	  | What does surprise me is that nobody else sees the jelly or the sashimi-sword.  I guess my preference for big fish handicaps me in seeing other patterns. <sigh> | 
 I spent 30 minutes using my solver to try and find which steps you used to get to the PM with the Jellyfish. I finally decided that I didn't want to know badly enough
  | 
 
 Why would any one try nasty methods to avoid ER,  a horrible step.  Fair Ball.
 
 I didn't get to the Jelly on purpose,  I don't use some steps,  or miss them,  and there I was.
 
 Wait a sec.  Franken something is just an ER?
 Why would anyone make it harder to spot?
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:20 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| [Withdrawn: unnecessary case of rambling!] 
 Last edited by daj95376 on Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:23 am; edited 1 time in total
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| wapati 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Jun 2008
 Posts: 472
 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:06 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I use method two but I do ERs pretty late in my solving. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |