| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Clement
 
 
  Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1113 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:51 pm    Post subject: Mar 17 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				After the Basics 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 9  8 3 | 7  1   26  | 26 4  5  |
 
| 6  4 1 | -89 258 259 | 28 3  7  |
 
| 7  2 5 | 3  68  4   | 1  68 9  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 1  9 4 | 68 27  27  | 3  5  68 |
 
| 38 5 2 | 4  9   36  | 68 7  1  |
 
| 38 7 6 | 1  58  35  | 4  9  2  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 5  3 7 | 2  4   1   | 9  68 68 |
 
| 4  1 8 | 69 67  679 | 5  2  3  |
 
| 2  6 9 | 5  3   8   | 7  1  4  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
 | 	  Remote pairs on 68; r2c4<>8 solves it. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:46 am    Post subject: Re: Mar 17 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Clement wrote: | 	 		  After the Basics 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 9  8 3 | 7  1   26  | 26 4  5  |
 
| 6  4 1 | -89 258 259 | 28 3  7  |
 
| 7  2 5 | 3  68  4   | 1  68 9  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 1  9 4 | 68 27  27  | 3  5  68 |
 
| 38 5 2 | 4  9   36  | 68 7  1  |
 
| 38 7 6 | 1  58  35  | 4  9  2  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 5  3 7 | 2  4   1   | 9  68 68 |
 
| 4  1 8 | 69 67  679 | 5  2  3  |
 
| 2  6 9 | 5  3   8   | 7  1  4  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
 | 	  Remote pairs on 68; r2c4<>8 solves it. | 	  
 
I used the 896 XY-Wing pivoted in r2c4; r8c5<>6. I can't find the Remote Pairs. The closest I can come is Simple Coloring, 68-68-68-28. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Clement
 
 
  Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1113 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:10 am    Post subject: Re: Mar 17 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		   	  | Clement wrote: | 	 		  After the Basics 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 9  8 3 | 7  1   26  | 26 4  5  |
 
| 6  4 1 | -89 258 259 | 28 3  7  |
 
| 7  2 5 | 3  68  4   | 1  68 9  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 1  9 4 | 68 27  27  | 3  5  68 |
 
| 38 5 2 | 4  9   36  | 68 7  1  |
 
| 38 7 6 | 1  58  35  | 4  9  2  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 5  3 7 | 2  4   1   | 9  68 68 |
 
| 4  1 8 | 69 67  679 | 5  2  3  |
 
| 2  6 9 | 5  3   8   | 7  1  4  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
 | 	  Remote pairs on 68; r2c4<>8 solves it. | 	  
 
I used the 896 XY-Wing pivoted in r2c4; r8c5<>6. I can't find the Remote Pairs. The closest I can come is Simple Coloring, 68-68-68-28. | 	  The remote pairs I am refering in my Grid are as follows: 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 9  8 3 | 7  1   26  | 26 4  5  |
 
| 6  4 1 | 89 258 259 | 28 3  7  |
 
| 7  2 5 | 3  A68  4   | 1  B68 9  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 1  9 4 | F68 27  27  | 3  5  E68 |
 
| 38 5 2 | 4  9   36  | 68 7  1  |
 
| 38 7 6 | 1  58  35  | 4  9  2  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
| 5  3 7 | 2  4   1   | 9  C68 D68 |
 
| 4  1 8 | 69 67  679 | 5  2  3  |
 
| 2  6 9 | 5  3   8   | 7  1  4  |
 
+--------+------------+----------+
 
 | 	  A->B->C->D->E->F. A and F can see r2c4; r2c4<>8. Pairs can be used to remove a single candidate. If you like you can refer this route as singles chains on 8. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		skegbyrd
 
 
  Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Posts: 2
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:58 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I don't understand x wings.  I solved it with,  r2 c 5, 6  & 7. 258, 25, 28 so r2 c4 must be 9. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		hughwill
 
 
  Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 424 Location: Birmingham UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:15 am    Post subject: Re: Mar 17 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Clement's chain also sets r6c5 to 5 solving the puzzle. I couldn't get as far as
 
Skegbyrd with basics to remove the 2 from r2c5 and the 9 from r2c6......
 
 
But the humdrum XY wing 896 did the job for me- I'm sure someone 
 
(Marty, Arkitech?)will point Skegbyrd in the direction of one of the great
 
explanations of wings opening up a whole new world of solving! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:47 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | skegbyrd wrote: | 	 		  | I don't understand x wings.  | 	  
 
 
The best way to understand the xy-wing is go to the pivot. In this case it is r2c4 with two possible candidates 8 or 9.
 
 
If r2c4 is an 8 then r2c5 is a 6.
 
 
If r2c4 is an 9 then r8c4 is a 6.
 
 
This means r8c5 cannot be a 6.
 
 
This solves ther puzzle .. (only singles remain).
 
 
Hope this helps. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:01 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | A->B->C->D->E->F. A and F can see r2c4; r2c4<>8. | 	   
 
 
Clement, thanks for straightening me out. I should have been able to spot that.    | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		skegbyrd
 
 
  Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Posts: 2
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:23 am    Post subject: xy wing | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I think I have it but you made it a little more difficult saying r2 c5 is a 6 when I think you meant r3 c5.  I have read various articles trying to explain them but yours was the best.  Thanks. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |