| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Clement 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1113
 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 10:38 pm    Post subject: Apr 7 VH |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| XY-Wing 56-4 pivoted in r9c8; r8c1<>4; stte 	  | Code: |  	  | +-----------+-----------+---------+
 | 7  6   8  | 5  19 49  | 2  14 3 |
 | 9  1   5  | 48 3  2   | 7  48 6 |
 | 3  4   2  | 78 17 6   | 9  18 5 |
 +-----------+-----------+---------+
 | 5  7   4  | 6  2  1   | 3  9  8 |
 | 1  2   9  | 3  8  7   | 56 56 4 |
 | 68 38  36 | 9  4  5   | 1  2  7 |
 +-----------+-----------+---------+
 | 2  38  36 | 1  5  348 | 46 7  9 |
 | 8-4 589 7  | 2  6  489 | 45 3  1 |
 | 46 359 1  | 47 79 349 | 8  56 2 |
 +-----------+-----------+---------+
 
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| kuskey 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Dec 2008
 Posts: 141
 Location: Pembroke, NH
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:50 am    Post subject: Apr 7 VH |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Clement, after looking at your after-basics code I see much more basic work that can be done. After a fashion, you end up with a BUG+1 in box 8 which is another 1-stepper solution. Many hiddens in this puzzle. I concur with your XY-wing. I solved it 3 times and got 3 identical results. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Clement 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1113
 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:03 am    Post subject: Re: Apr 7 VH |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Thanks kuskey for pointing that out. Uncompleted basics can sometimes(it has happened) result to an invalid path leading to the solution. Thanks. 	  | kuskey wrote: |  	  | Clement, after looking at your after-basics code I see much more basic work that can be done. After a fashion, you end up with a BUG+1 in box 8 which is another 1-stepper solution. Many hiddens in this puzzle. I concur with your XY-wing. | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| dongrave 
 
 
 Joined: 06 Mar 2014
 Posts: 572
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:03 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I wouldn't really call that much more basic work.  To me it looks like he only missed one of the 2 possible naked pairs in column 2 followed by the lone 3 in row 9 (I think). |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |